Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW
 
PerlMonks  

Re^4: Grammarians: do we need a new group?

by ptum (Priest)
on Jan 09, 2007 at 15:41 UTC ( [id://593740]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^3: Grammarians: do we need a new group?
in thread Grammarians: do we need a new group?

Personally, I appreciate the time and interest expended when someone corrects one of my posts for grammar or spelling (or logical weakness), especially if it is done in a gracious or lighthearted manner. I doubt that we need a formalized group for such things -- I think there already are a few monks out there who will /msg if they notice a blatant error which detracts from the effectiveness of a node.

  • Comment on Re^4: Grammarians: do we need a new group?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://593740]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others drinking their drinks and smoking their pipes about the Monastery: (4)
As of 2024-04-25 13:27 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found