Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
XP is just a number
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Grammarians: do we need a new group?

by almut (Canon)
on Jan 09, 2007 at 14:19 UTC ( [id://593729]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Grammarians: do we need a new group?
in thread Grammarians: do we need a new group?

The doesn't even get into slang and other such constructs.

While we're at it... Can the determinate article "the" act as a subject, as in the sentence above? Shouldn't this rather be a demonstrative pronoun like "that" or "this"? :)

(I'm not a native speaker of English, but this seems wrong grammatically...)

Anyway, as these example nitpickings show, I don't think this proposal is a good idea... (or should it be "I do think this proposal is not a good idea"...? ;)

(Almut goes back to her cave...)

  • Comment on Re^2: Grammarians: do we need a new group?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Grammarians: do we need a new group?
by syphilis (Archbishop) on Jan 09, 2007 at 15:01 UTC
    (I'm not a native speaker of English, but this seems wrong grammatically...)

    It's certainly wrong ... but whether it was a grammatical error or a typographical error could well be a moot point :-)

    I don't think this proposal is a good idea... (or should it be "I do think this proposal is not a good idea"...? ;)

    Heh ... nice point. In terms of "usage" there's no (or little) difference. But in terms of "logic" your question confuses the crap out of me.

    Cheers,
    Rob

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://593729]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others romping around the Monastery: (2)
As of 2024-04-25 19:28 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found