Re^2: Grammarians: do we need a new group?

Actually there's "grammer", which is a misspelling, and "grammar", which is the correct word. :)

(And no, I'm not volunteering. Again, low hanging fruit. Fish, barrel, gun. :)

Comment on Re^2: Grammarians: do we need a new group?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Grammarians: do we need a new group? by nimdokk (Vicar) on Jan 09, 2007 at 13:49 UTC
Never said I could spell :-) get too soft using spellcheck and auto-correct features.	[reply]


No such thing as a small change
	PerlMonks