![]() |
|
laziness, impatience, and hubris | |
PerlMonks |
Re^2: When should I use a dispatch table?by Limbic~Region (Chancellor) |
on Dec 01, 2006 at 01:14 UTC ( #587097=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
BrowserUk,
Don't blame the hash lookup performance here. I didn't. To quote myself from the very next sentence: The hash does have the overhead of looking up the key, dereferencing the value, and executing the code ref. I knew that subroutine overhead is expensive - I even wrote a node inquiring into optimizing them a few years ago: (Inline subs?). I am glad you replied and allocated the majority of the performance hit to the correct culprit. Unfortunately, typical dispatch tables use code refs. I hear lots of good things about bleed perl so hopefully 5.10 will be released soon. Cheers - L~R
In Section
Meditations
|
|