Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Just another Perl shrine
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: DBD::Oracle faster with bound sql than stored procedures?

by andreas1234567 (Vicar)
on Nov 25, 2006 at 13:00 UTC ( [id://586004]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: DBD::Oracle faster with bound sql than stored procedures?
in thread DBD::Oracle faster with bound sql than stored procedures?

Why on Earth would you want to swap your RDBMS?
I never wrote that. I'm exploring a new platform of curiosity, trying so see what it has to offer. So far it seems very promising.
If you don't know who 'Ask Tom' then perhaps you should find cout.
I bought one of his books and I will continue to read his columns.
As for maintaince nightmares. Yup, I've seen those, Embedded dynamic SQL in Java code was the worst.
I second that.
As for the Oracle client C library, yes its blisteringly fast.
Do you mean replacing DBD::Oracle with some kind of compiled C routines?

Andreas
--
  • Comment on Re^3: DBD::Oracle faster with bound sql than stored procedures?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: DBD::Oracle faster with bound sql than stored procedures?
by Jonathan (Curate) on Dec 04, 2006 at 12:30 UTC
    Do you mean replacing DBD::Oracle with some kind of compiled C routines?

    No, DBD::Oracle uses the Oracle client software. You don't need to use any 'C' code.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://586004]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others rifling through the Monastery: (1)
As of 2024-04-25 05:51 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found