|
|
|
| Problems? Is your data what you think it is? | |
| PerlMonks |
Re^2: Parrot, threads & fears for the future.by BrowserUk (Patriarch) |
| on Oct 23, 2006 at 18:31 UTC ( [id://580122]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
|
That's why I heartily support the death of threads in HLL's! Funnily enough, I agree. I've been banging on about that for a couple of years. I think I even recall having a conversation with you about it by email 2 or more years ago. Parrot is not a high level language. If the HLL Perl6, is to provide for user transparent threading semantics; and if Perl6 is to run atop the Parrot VM; then Parrot has to do threads. And be written from the ground up to do threads well. Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
Lingua non convalesco, consenesco et abolesco. -- Rule 1 has a caveat! -- Who broke the cabal?
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
In Section
Meditations
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||