Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change

Re^3: The purpose of testing

by g0n (Priest)
on Oct 18, 2006 at 11:58 UTC ( #579050=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^2: The purpose of testing
in thread The purpose of testing

For the record, when I said QA, I meant QA, in the project management sense of the term. In our environment we don't have a separate testing function, developers test each others code (but never their own). QA should absolutely be independent, to ensure that political expendiency cannot override fundamental quality standards. On a different project I worked on (for a different organisation) without an independent quality function, testing could be (and frequently was) almost entirely dispensed with by management edict in order to meet a deadline. The result was disastrous, except for the project manager who was only judged on meeting the deadline, not the quality of the final deliverables. An independent quality function is there to ensure such ill advised deviations from procedure don't happen.


"If there is such a phenomenon as absolute evil, it consists in treating another human being as a thing."
John Brunner, "The Shockwave Rider".

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://579050]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others taking refuge in the Monastery: (1)
As of 2023-01-29 05:27 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found