Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Do you know where your variables are?
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Adding Tests to Mature Web App

by Anonymous Monk
on Aug 09, 2006 at 19:48 UTC ( [id://566470]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Adding Tests to Mature Web App
in thread Adding Tests to Mature Web App

Can I just add that I'm *really* not a fan of the "Developer's Notebook" format?

1) The printing is terrible, dark-blue print with an ugly typeface on a mock graph paper background. And the faux "handwritten" side notes are actually as hard to read as somebody's handwriting. Typography is actually supposed to make something *easier* to read, not harder.

2) The structure of the sections means I'm constantly flipping back and forth, to a degree that I never have to for other O'Reilly books--e.g., they have a section labeled "How do I do that?", then a section labeled "What just happened?" Honestly, I think a section called "What's about to happen?" followed by a how-to makes vastly greater sense. Sort of like writing tests before code, writing what you expect to happen before you show it happening communicates the intent much more clearly.

3) The whole "No lengthy explanations" attitude makes me feel like this was a way for O'Reilly to ship a book 40% of the size of a typical offering (180 pp., including index), and still charge 90% of the price ($29.95 USD).

I know chromatic is both smart and helpful, and I trust that Langworth is, too, but this format really, really bites. There's a lot of information in it, but there's more work to dig it out than should be necessary. I think it has such a high reputation because it's the only book that focuses exclusively on this particular subject.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Adding Tests to Mature Web App
by adrianh (Chancellor) on Aug 10, 2006 at 08:12 UTC

    While I, personally, find the structure / length completely appropriate I do agree with:

    1) The printing is terrible, dark-blue print with an ugly typeface on a mock graph paper background. And the faux "handwritten" side notes are actually as hard to read as somebody's handwriting. Typography is actually supposed to make something *easier* to read, not harder.

    The mock graph paper and the right-justified typewriter font make reading the main text a pain. Everybody in the office whose read PDTN has agreed. Pity since the content's nice, and O'Reilly books are normally a model of clarity.

    If you're new to Perl testing I'd definitely spend the extra effort to get past the presentation.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://566470]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others examining the Monastery: (5)
As of 2024-03-28 23:46 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found