Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl: the Markov chain saw
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Professional Toolkits <=> vim + shell

by ciderpunx (Vicar)
on Apr 06, 2006 at 11:34 UTC ( [id://541617]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Professional Toolkits <=> vim + shell

> vim + shell + perldoc

You missed google!

On a more serious note, one disadvantage of "integrating" your development environment is that you lose (or sideline, anyhow) the flexibility and power of the shell.

I'm also a big fan of using one editor - in my case vim - for everything. So I use my editor for developing perl, ruby, php and java but also for email and for drafting documents (they go into openoffice if they need to look pretty).

I guess if you're wroking on a project that'll involve pair programming it'd be pretty important to have a standardized setup of editor/shell or IDE. Even if that meant having to not use your favourite editor/IDE. Does anyone have any experience of getting agreements on tools - I imagine its a herding cats type situation!
  • Comment on Re: Professional Toolkits <=> vim + shell

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Professional Toolkits <=> vim + shell
by wazoox (Prior) on Apr 06, 2006 at 16:51 UTC
    In my office we're two working with nedit, and two working with emacs. No problem so far...

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://541617]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others musing on the Monastery: (4)
As of 2024-04-18 20:04 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found