Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl: the Markov chain saw
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Double voting (to get better answers as well?)

by GhodMode (Pilgrim)
on Feb 06, 2006 at 16:43 UTC ( [id://528267]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Double voting (to get better answers as well?)

Just my 2 cents worth:

I would like the ability to double-vote a really significant post. That includes up and down.

I don't think there should be an additional bonus to the voter for double-voting. If someone wants to cry that they don't get as much XP as they would if they used the two votes separately... screw them. This isn't an RPG.

I value my privacy! I don't want someone getting a message stating that I double-voted his post whether it was up or down. I don't want buddies or enemies and I definitely don't want obligations. Our posts should be judged based solely on the quality of the post.

For example, if a monk usually posts helpful and insightful messages, I might vote him up without replying to his posts. If the same monk posts just to flame a newbie I'll vote him down. I don't feel bad and he doesn't have the opportunity to think "WTF... this guy usually votes me up."

--
-- GhodMode
Blessed is he who has found his work; let him ask no other blessedness.
-- Thomas Carlyle
  • Comment on Re: Double voting (to get better answers as well?)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://528267]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others having a coffee break in the Monastery: (3)
As of 2024-04-25 22:36 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found