Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change

Re^2: 'grouping' substrings?

by revdiablo (Prior)
on Feb 01, 2006 at 16:42 UTC ( #527108=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: 'grouping' substrings?
in thread 'grouping' substrings?

I dont know whether using $& is effecient or not.

Using $& is not efficient, and usually to be avoided. See the entry in perlvar for details.

Update: perhaps I was a bit imprecise. I'd say something that "imposes a considerable performance penalty on all regular expression matches" is inefficient, but I guess it depends on what type of inefficiency we're talking about.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: 'grouping' substrings?
by ikegami (Pope) on Feb 01, 2006 at 16:52 UTC

    That's not exactly true. $& is only inefficient if you have another regexp in your program which doesn't capture.

    However, it's use is discouraged, since captures can perform the same task without the "effect at a distance" of $&.

    In this case, just replace $& with $1, and you're set.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://527108]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others pondering the Monastery: (1)
As of 2021-12-04 17:50 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    R or B?

    Results (30 votes). Check out past polls.