Syntactic Confectionery Delight | |
PerlMonks |
Re^2: Double voting (to get better answers as well?)by jbrugger (Parson) |
on Jan 30, 2006 at 07:31 UTC ( [id://526395]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
I would not go to another supersearch, but just click on your name, then on your 'writeups', but that's not what i ment. I'd like to create a way of 'rewarding' monks so they feel like giving more effort in creating better nodes/answers than those that are not. Indeed, davido gave a good reason why not, GrandFather gave a good reason why we should. I don't want to create a 'vote shower', but the thing is, the Voting/Experience System works, even though it should be a non issue, everyone likes his nodes (and then ego) to be ++ed. I won't -- you here, but i'd never do it this way.... I'm lying now, i gave one person all my possible ++ votes because of a joke / chat in the chatterbox one day...
"We all agree on the necessity of compromise. We just can't agree on when it's necessary to compromise." - Larry Wall.
In Section
Perl Monks Discussion
|
|