+++ ;) This is the first thing that I thought when I read the parent node.
Also, anyone voting to ++ a node, even though they are using three (or four) votes, should only have a chance to get 1 exp from their vote. It will discourage people from +++ing nodes to use up their exp.
Of course, nowadays, even though you can't +++ a node, if you really like something someone wrote, you can go into their past nodes and find another you like to upvote. It doesn't raise the reputation of the node that you really like, but it gives them more of a chance for exp. | [reply] |
I agree. I was thinking that at minimum a super vote should cost the voter twice or three times as many votes as the vote was worth.
Not only would it make people use it cautiously it would also prevent serious abuse from occuring due to personality voting. Which afaik is the primary reason that we have never put together an implementation of this suggestion.
---
$world=~s/war/peace/g
| [reply] |
