Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl-Sensitive Sunglasses

Re: Control of Problem Members

by little (Curate)
on Jan 16, 2001 at 20:31 UTC ( #52262=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Control of Problem Members

I'd support the idea to limit Anonymous Monk to only post in Seekers of Perl Wisdom. As all questions have to be checked by higher ranked perlmonks we should not check these kind o questions as bein "ok".
All further action against looks to me as a bit too much of havin a "BigBrother".

Have a nice day
All decision is left to your taste

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Control of Problem Members
by lemming (Priest) on Jan 17, 2001 at 22:24 UTC

    I think this might be a good solution. I would take it slightly further.

    Only allow Anon posts on the root node of SoPW & to replies of that node. So you could have:
    root node by anon,
    then a reply by a named monk that asks for clarification or such
    Then there can be an anon reply to that.
    This would allow anon monks to ask questions, but if they troll, just don't reply and in most cases it can be deleted if warranted. (yech grammar)

    That would stop posts like: [no such node, ID 52589]

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://52262]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others scrutinizing the Monastery: (6)
As of 2021-01-17 18:36 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?