Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
There's more than one way to do things
 
PerlMonks  

Re^11: Spot the bug

by shotgunefx (Parson)
on Dec 22, 2005 at 23:18 UTC ( #518661=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^10: Spot the bug
in thread Spot the bug

I actually gave five examples of side effects (looking at a value, assignment, warn, processing @ARGV, reading from a handle).

Well, you got me there. Shouldn't answer nodes right after rolling out of bed. Now, you might not call them side-effects, but than you have a private definition of a side-effect. Using private definitions doesn't contribute to succesful communication.

I thought that was quite clear.
Personally, I don't consider your two examples as side effects (even though some would)

Yes from a language design standpoint, Perl is full of side effects. I'm talking about the expectations of people using Perl. Yes, it's a well know trap and easy to avoid.

But it's non-intuitive and dare I say non-sensical. I'd be hard pressed to think of any situation were someone would want their loop iterations influenced transparently by code outside the current scope. Certainly that's what most people don't want the majority of the time. It doesn't follow expectation.


-Lee

perl digital dash (in progress)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://518661]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others surveying the Monastery: (6)
As of 2021-04-13 15:48 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found

    Notices?