Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris
 
PerlMonks  

Re^5: What's so bad about &function(...)?

by jdporter (Paladin)
on Dec 20, 2005 at 13:07 UTC ( [id://518056]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^4: What's so bad about &function(...)?
in thread What's so bad about &function(...)?

I didn't miss anything. You seem to have missed my entire point, which was that the ampersand on a sub call is as useless an elaboration as the above array thing.

(Of course, it's not really entirely as useless; it's only useless if you avoid coding in a way that exploits the ampersand's wierdness. In general, I avoid such coding, and claim it is a "best practice".)

We're building the house of the future together.
  • Comment on Re^5: What's so bad about &function(...)?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://518056]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others making s'mores by the fire in the courtyard of the Monastery: (1)
As of 2024-04-25 04:10 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found