Re^3: What's so bad about &function(...)?

In Perl5, if you have arguments to a function, the parenthesis are optional if you don't use the & sigil (unless of course they are needed to prevent misparsing). However, if you use &foo to call a sub, and you want to call it with arguments, the parenthesis are mandatory.

Will you be able to do:

    &foo 1, 2, 3
[download]

in Perl6?

Perl --((8:>*

Comment on Re^3: What's so bad about &function(...)? Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: What's so bad about &function(...)? by TimToady (Parson) on Dec 10, 2005 at 00:02 UTC
Nope, Perl 6 still has to be picky about when it is expecting a term and when it is expecting an operator. It's vaguely possible we could allow `&foo: 1, 2, 3` [download] however, since there are already other cases where a colon allows us to omit the parens. Can't say it's high on my list of priorities though.	[reply] [d/l]


laziness, impatience, and hubris
	PerlMonks