Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
There's more than one way to do things

Re^3: using pipes in a system() call

by swkronenfeld (Hermit)
on Dec 07, 2005 at 19:41 UTC ( #515004=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^2: using pipes in a system() call
in thread using pipes in a system() call

Valid point Fletch.

I wrote it the way I did because I was thinking of a short-term debugging effort, where the OP would erase the line after seeing what it expanded to. When passing shorter length system calls (and this applies to other functions as well), I prefer to have the command written inside the call, rather than forcing my brain to stop reading along with the flow of the program and backtrack to the $command variable definition.

Regardless, not knowing how the OP would be using our advice though, I should not have posted like this.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: using pipes in a system() call
by Fletch (Bishop) on Dec 07, 2005 at 19:50 UTC

    Yeah, not that I'm saying I haven't done just that myself before (and still do if it's really an emergency; then I get bitten and go back and wind up doing it the right way when I'm tracking down the bugs that caused . . . :).

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://515004]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others avoiding work at the Monastery: (8)
As of 2022-11-29 21:09 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?