Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

Re^5: Attack on Perl or Perl's need better PR (again)

by Anonymous Monk
on Dec 01, 2005 at 19:02 UTC ( [id://513387]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^4: Attack on Perl or Perl's need better PR (again)
in thread Attack on Perl or Perl's need better PR (again)

If you are making the point that human made creations will never be perfect, I'm in 100% agreement. But with some (minor? major? moderate?) effort we could reduce the incidence and severity of bugs by factors of thousands if not millions. In my view, that seems like a goal worth striving for. Along with capabilities, and memory management, we can employ better testing strategies and static typing and other lightweight formal methods. Here, I'll mention some of Les Hatton's publications. I'm only railing against the notion that we're already doing a good job at security. We're not. We need all the help we can get. And better languages will make it a lot easier.
  • Comment on Re^5: Attack on Perl or Perl's need better PR (again)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://513387]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others romping around the Monastery: (3)
As of 2024-04-25 02:22 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found