Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Do you know where your variables are?
 
PerlMonks  

Re^6: Maintainer looking for a module

by McDarren (Abbot)
on Nov 29, 2005 at 07:11 UTC ( [id://512537]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^5: Maintainer looking for a module
in thread Maintainer looking for a module

This node falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: Maintainer looking for a module
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Nov 29, 2005 at 12:16 UTC
    Lets take PM posts as an example. Why do we have a preview button?

    I preview every post I make here at least 3 and sometimes a dozen times--perhaps it is possible for the gods here at PM to confirm this? For the last year, I have had installed and use a spell checker integrated into my browser specifically for this purpose.

    And I invariably go back to each of my posts a few hours or days later and I nearly always find further things to correct. Doubled words, or missing words, or homonyms, without even considering obvious grammatical errors. Things I simply do not "see" the first few times.

    There is no lack of care or laziness involved, but still I make these mistakes. Look further.


    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    Lingua non convalesco, consenesco et abolesco. -- Rule 1 has a caveat! -- Who broke the cabal?
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
Re^7: Maintainer looking for a module
by YuckFoo (Abbot) on Nov 29, 2005 at 22:05 UTC
    How long does it take to quickly preview your post before you create it to check that it actually says what you want it to say and is reasonably coherant?

    or even coherent?

    YickFu

Re^7: Maintainer looking for a module
by McDarren (Abbot) on Nov 29, 2005 at 12:39 UTC
    I preview every post I make here at least 3 and sometimes a dozen times--

    --snip--

    There is no lack of care or laziness involved, but still I make these mistakes.

    Yes, and that's exactly my point. I do the same - not only here at PM, but in any situation where I have something to communicate - as I'm sure you also do. Those of us that care will make the small additional effort that it takes to review what we have to say before we say it. And yet small mistakes inevitably creep through. This is what I call accidental sloppiness - and that's fine. It's the deliberate sloppiness that I object to. Where somebody just goes "BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH" and expects everybody in the world to know exactly what they are on about.

    I'll shut up now {grin}

    Update:And speaking of accidental sloppiness, I just realised that I replied to my own node. Well, duh! I rest my case :D

      But you are still missing the point.

      I expend the time to do this here at PM because I spend a lot of time here and I have seen the judgemental way such trivia is commonly disdained. In the vast majority of cases, if I posted my raw output without any correction, most people would understand perfectly what I was saying, despite the omitted, doubled, misspelt, misplaced and jumbled words. The human speech processing abilities are extraordinary in the way they will allow the reader to extrapolate meaning from quite extraordinarily "bad" communications. To wit, that most people can easily read all but the most extreme of sms txt msgs, is testimony.

      If you have had occasion to see the content of a youthful bulletin board, as I did recently when helping my niece, you would probably be horrified at the extent to which txting has become lingua-franca for those of a certain age group. Just as my father was at my eldest sister's (a child of the late '60s) use of the slang of her day. Or as she was in turn, when her daughter was taught a style of handwriting (I think called italic cursive) in her primary school--she (the daughter) is now 30+ and has the most exquisite handwriting.

      It's called "resistance to change", or "looking back with rose tinted glasses". For the most part, the current generation of Internet connected kids will see the world, and accept forms of communication, in an entirely different way to my generation and yours (probably). Just as we do from that of our parents.

      Now go off and look up the word aphasia. And before you dismiss it as something that only affects a few people, read down a ways and realise that over 1 million Americans, and millions more around this Internet connected globe are sufferers to some lesser or greater extent. And that is just those who are diagnosed as such and therefore know. Many, many more think, because it is what they are told, that they are just dumb.

      And consider this. The most debilitating, insipid and insidious of prejudices are no longer the "big four"--colour, race, sex and religion--as practiced by governments, corporations or loud-mouthed bigots and the 'political' groups to which they belong, nor the extremist organisations.

      The prejudices that affect the most people, and have the greatest effect on their daily lives, are the myriad small, insignificant, unthinking, pervasive prejudices that are knowingly or unwittingly perpetuated through millions of mildly discriminatory acts by millions of otherwise perfectly nice, well-rounded individuals every day.

      Whenever we make a judgement about someone on the basis of 'that is typical of "them"', where 'them' is some non-specific group of people to which you have ascribed the individual, without knowing their individual circumstances,--and we all do this to some greater or lesser degree, including me--we are acting upon, and perpetuating prejudice. And whilst each act by each individual is small; collectively, they can have a significant affect upon the recipients of our lack of thought and care.


      Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
      Lingua non convalesco, consenesco et abolesco. -- Rule 1 has a caveat! -- Who broke the cabal?
      "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
      In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://512537]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others avoiding work at the Monastery: (9)
As of 2024-04-16 08:48 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found