Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
go ahead... be a heretic

Re: Your named arguments

by Aragorn (Curate)
on Nov 09, 2005 at 08:01 UTC ( #506999=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Your named arguments

At work we use Params::Check. Reasonable simple, and it does the job. The example in the documentation uses %hash, which I don't approve of. I use %args_in which covers the meaning nicely. Maybe %params_in would be even better.


All that is gold does not glitter...

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Your named arguments
by Juerd (Abbot) on Nov 09, 2005 at 21:02 UTC

    I use %args_in which covers the meaning nicely. Maybe %params_in would be even better.

    No, parameters are expected, while arguments are passed. The hash contains arguments, never parameters.

    Given foo => $bar, the parameter is "foo", and the argument is $bar, named by the name of the parameter.

    In Perl 6:

    sub foo ($foo, $bar) { # $foo and $bar are *parameters* # But in the sub itself, they represent the *arguments* ... } foo(42, 15); # positional arguments foo(foo => 42, bar => 15); # named arguments foo(bar => 15, foo => 42); # same thing :)

    Juerd # { site => '', plp_site => '', do_not_use => 'spamtrap' }

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://506999]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (3)
As of 2022-09-27 04:10 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    I prefer my indexes to start at:

    Results (118 votes). Check out past polls.