Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
"be consistent"
 
PerlMonks  

Re^4: How about coloured names based on xp's?

by Aristotle (Chancellor)
on Nov 07, 2005 at 14:52 UTC ( [id://506356]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^3: How about coloured names based on xp's?
in thread How about coloured names based on xp's?

I concede that my experiences may not be representative. And I know the overall maturity level at those forums was lower than it is at PM. But I’ve seen it happen three times – and in all three times, the ranking was not initially displayed openly, then was, then it was turned off again –, so all my experience so far suggests that such open display degrades the quality of interaction on a forum.

PM might be better able to carry that weight, and maybe even a lot better – but I’m certain that it will lead to some amount of degradation, if only mild.

The question I’d ask is: why should we do this? Is there anything to be gained from it? Are there any real benefits which need to be weighed against the expectable drawbacks?

Makeshifts last the longest.

  • Comment on Re^4: How about coloured names based on xp's?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: How about coloured names based on xp's?
by kiat (Vicar) on Nov 08, 2005 at 01:57 UTC
    The question I’d ask is: why should we do this? Is there anything to be gained from it? Are there any real benefits which need to be weighed against the expectable drawbacks?

    To answer those questions, it's important to first answer the question why ranks are there in the first place.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://506356]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others sharing their wisdom with the Monastery: (3)
As of 2024-04-24 06:05 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found