Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
There's more than one way to do things
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Regarding the recent node retitling sentiments (considering)

by tye (Sage)
on Nov 05, 2005 at 06:43 UTC ( [id://505947]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Regarding the recent node retitling sentiments

Yes. You should not consider a node for a new title because you think that the current title sucks. You should consider a node for a new title because you have a great idea for a much better title, and because the current title sucks.

Only consider a node if you both feel strongly that something needs to be done and you have a concrete suggestion for exactly how to fix things. So please don't consider "the small stuff" and don't be eager to "help out" and jump to make a consideration when you don't have a great solution to provide. The person making the consideration needs to be the one doing the hard work of figuring out the best solution.

It'll be nice one day to be able to have multiple considerations per node at once, so someone can suggest a better idea when a mediocre consideration gets made. However, the long-awaited consideration system revamp still hasn't been rolled out so I'm not holding my breath on when such an enhancement could be made available...

- tye        

  • Comment on Re: Regarding the recent node retitling sentiments (considering)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://505947]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others sharing their wisdom with the Monastery: (3)
As of 2024-04-24 22:05 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found