Re^3: Dan Sugalski's Parrot Post Mortem


"be consistent"
	PerlMonks

Re^3: Dan Sugalski's Parrot Post Mortem

by dpuu (Chaplain)

on Oct 24, 2005 at 00:02 UTC ( [id://502347]=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to Re^2: Dan Sugalski's Parrot Post Mortem
in thread Dan Sugalski's Parrot Post Mortem

I had a quick look at the "set of milestones" referenced by Ovid. It has the appearence of a dead document: the status of Milestone 1 ends with: "Patrick's expecting a vastly updated engine incorporating subrules and these new features within March 2005." Given today's date is October 2005, this suggests that the status hasn't been updated for at least 6 months.

Later, we see threads: "Design worked out, but still in Dan's head". Maybe this is still true but, if so, it needs to be extracted.

--Dave
Opinions my own; statements of fact may be in error.

Comment on Re^3: Dan Sugalski's Parrot Post Mortem

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^4: Dan Sugalski's Parrot Post Mortem
by Anonymous Monk on Oct 24, 2005 at 00:10 UTC

To be frank, it will not be a surprise if the project is actually cold dead now. To pick up something years later, most likely throw some old idea around, in a industry famous for its changing, that itself is a bad sign instead of a good one. Not to say, as you have pointed out, there is sign that they didn't really pick up.

The fate of Perl 6 and Parrot could be quite miserable, and is not the first tme you see in this industry.

[reply]

In Section Perl News