Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
"be consistent"

Re^3: Namespaces contiguous in the entirety

by broquaint (Abbot)
on Sep 28, 2005 at 15:32 UTC ( #495799=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^2: Namespaces contiguous in the entirety
in thread Namespaces contiguous in the entirety

  1. The first package specific_name statement creates a namespace and enters it.
  2. Subsequent invocations simply reenter the namespace.
While you may view that as conceptually accurate, that is not really what happens, hence my confusion above. I don't think I've ever come across this being an issue, not least because I would imagine that if you called code on a class you thought had declared, when in fact you had redeclared an existing class, something would break rather loudly.

I can't think of any obvious way to do this within perl, but as you say, it would probably fairly simple just to hack the perl source and recompile.



  • Comment on Re^3: Namespaces contiguous in the entirety

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Namespaces contiguous in the entirety
by diotalevi (Canon) on Sep 28, 2005 at 15:42 UTC
    The obvious way is to examine all the COP nodes in the compiled program and see that packages don't appear in multiple files. This is test should fit inside of a few lines.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://495799]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others making s'mores by the fire in the courtyard of the Monastery: (5)
As of 2022-08-08 13:30 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found