Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid

Re: RFC: Preaching section on PM

by xdg (Monsignor)
on Sep 27, 2005 at 16:19 UTC ( #495434=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to RFC: Preaching section on PM

A lot of this right now seems to wind up in Meditations (or sometimes Cool Uses for Perl and Announcements). There might be a benefit to differentiating between insights about Perl programming ("this is an interesting technique I discovered") and insights about Perl ("Perl is really cool, helps me code quickly, and I love it"). That said, as responses to my post New section for Regex Q's? suggest, there's a lot of legitimate concern about too much fragmentation. The volume of advocacy posts is sufficiently low that I don't know that it's really a problem right now. (Maybe the lack of advocacy is a problem, but that's a whole separate story.)


Code written by xdg and posted on PerlMonks is public domain. It is provided as is with no warranties, express or implied, of any kind. Posted code may not have been tested. Use of posted code is at your own risk.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: RFC: Preaching section on PM
by tomazos (Deacon) on Sep 27, 2005 at 16:32 UTC
    I suppose one of the motivations behind the RFC is that such a section would encourage more posting surrounding such subject matter.

    I think the section would be a superset of just advocacy (see list), and think it is a broad enough and important enough topic to warrant more thinking about.


    Andrew Tomazos  |  |

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://495434]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others making s'mores by the fire in the courtyard of the Monastery: (4)
As of 2020-10-22 01:39 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    My favourite web site is:

    Results (225 votes). Check out past polls.