Re^2: Renaming the Schwartzian Transform


Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister
	PerlMonks

by ikegami (Patriarch)

on Sep 23, 2005 at 21:57 UTC ( [id://494696]=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

Wouldn't it be Jacques's Transform? But then you end up with too many esses. :)

Comment on Re^2: Renaming the Schwartzian Transform

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Renaming the Schwartzian Transform by parv (Parson) on Sep 23, 2005 at 22:01 UTC
No need to be possessive, neither of Fourier and Laplace were.	[reply]
Re^4: Renaming the Schwartzian Transform by ikegami (Patriarch) on Sep 23, 2005 at 22:04 UTC
Yes, but then it "used" to be called the Schwartzian Transform, not the Schwartz Transform. Just keeping in line with the "old" name :)	[reply]
Re^5: Renaming the Schwartzian Transform by merlyn (Sage) on Sep 23, 2005 at 22:31 UTC
Wouldn't that be more like the Jacquonian Transform then? Not possessive, but derivative. It's not the Schwartz's transform. -- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker Be sure to read my standard disclaimer if this is a reply.	[reply]
Re^6: Renaming the Schwartzian Transform by ikegami (Patriarch) on Sep 23, 2005 at 23:22 UTC

In Section Meditations

Domain Nodelet^?

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://494696]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? • Last hour • Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others wandering the Monastery: (2)

As of 2024-04-25 20:29 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Voting Booth^?

No recent polls found