Re: Renaming the Schwartzian Transform


Problems? Is your data what you think it is?
	PerlMonks

by jacques (Priest)

on Sep 21, 2005 at 06:39 UTC ( [id://493672]=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

Jacques Transform has a nice ring to it. :)

Comment on Re: Renaming the Schwartzian Transform

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Renaming the Schwartzian Transform by ikegami (Patriarch) on Sep 23, 2005 at 21:57 UTC
Wouldn't it be Jacques's Transform? But then you end up with too many esses. :)	[reply]
Re^3: Renaming the Schwartzian Transform by parv (Parson) on Sep 23, 2005 at 22:01 UTC
No need to be possessive, neither of Fourier and Laplace were.	[reply]
Re^4: Renaming the Schwartzian Transform by ikegami (Patriarch) on Sep 23, 2005 at 22:04 UTC
Yes, but then it "used" to be called the Schwartzian Transform, not the Schwartz Transform. Just keeping in line with the "old" name :)	[reply]
Re^5: Renaming the Schwartzian Transform by merlyn (Sage) on Sep 23, 2005 at 22:31 UTC
Re^6: Renaming the Schwartzian Transform by ikegami (Patriarch) on Sep 23, 2005 at 23:22 UTC

In Section Meditations

Domain Nodelet^?

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://493672]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? • Last hour • Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others goofing around in the Monastery: (1)

As of 2024-04-25 03:40 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Voting Booth^?

No recent polls found