We don't bite newbies here... much | |
PerlMonks |
Re^2: Isn't Perl5 ready for C<my sub>?by friedo (Prior) |
on Sep 07, 2005 at 16:48 UTC ( [id://489932]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
(With all the caveats of local and symboltable hacking, of course.)
The main problem I see with this approach is that it doesn't behave the way we would expect a true lexical sub too. For example, I would expect the following to work:
Of course that won't work with the local trick since you can't have a lexical closure over a locally modified symbol table (as far as I know.) But it would work fine if you used my $bar = sub { print "42\n" }. I suppose a source filter to convert my sub bar { } to my $bar = sub { } would do the trick, but then you'd have to scan the rest of the block to change bar to $bar->(). Sounds like a real PITA.
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|