Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Isn't Perl5 ready for C<my sub>?

by blazar (Canon)
on Sep 07, 2005 at 15:26 UTC ( #489890=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Isn't Perl5 ready for C<my sub>?
in thread Isn't Perl5 ready for C<my sub>?

(With all the caveats of local and symboltable hacking, of course.)
Indeed. In fact this is a hack. Granted, a nice hack, but as I wrote, not that it is impossible to work around the lack of lexically scoped named subs, it's possible and even easy. We still simply lack them and I would feel comfortable having them instead. I would just be interested to know whether there's some major technical difficulty in this sense...

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://489890]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others pondering the Monastery: (5)
As of 2022-01-28 16:00 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    In 2022, my preferred method to securely store passwords is:












    Results (73 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?