Used or involved with Sprog?

willyyam has asked for the wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question:

I read an interesting article on Sprog, a Perl-based, graphical data-processing engine. It looks intriguing and perhaps useful, and I was wondering if anyone here has used it, or is involved with the project.

Update: I get that "Sprog" is a combination of sprocket and cog, which makes sense in the context of the program, but to me, a sprog is a child/baby/small person, which also kinda makes sense, but it results in strange mind-pictures.

Comment on Used or involved with Sprog?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Used or involved with Sprog? by jeffa (Bishop) on Jun 24, 2005 at 15:33 UTC
This announcement was posted just this morning by the author of that article: Data Munging with Sprog jeffa L-LL-L--L-LL-L--L-LL-L-- -R--R-RR-R--R-RR-R--R-RR B--B--B--B--B--B--B--B-- H---H---H---H---H---H--- (the triplet paradiddle with high-hat)	[reply]
Re^2: Used or involved with Sprog? by willyyam (Priest) on Jun 24, 2005 at 16:28 UTC
Oh for shame! I must remember to search first before posting. Thanks jeffa and grantm	[reply]
Re: Used or involved with Sprog? by ghenry (Vicar) on Jun 24, 2005 at 15:53 UTC
The mailing list looks a bit empty. But this may mean that it's just that good. Walking the road to enlightenment... I found a penguin and a camel on the way..... Fancy a yourname@perl.me.uk? Just ask!!!	[reply]
Re^2: Used or involved with Sprog? by grantm (Parson) on Jun 24, 2005 at 21:00 UTC
The mailing list looks a bit empty Yes it is a bit empty - primarily because not many people know about the project. It's all still in fairly early stages of development and until recently I've been a bit cautious about general announcements - I don't want to oversell anything. I'll be giving a talk about Sprog at OSCON, so I need to start getting the word out or nobody will know to come along :-).	[reply]


P is for Practical
	PerlMonks