Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Clear questions and runnable code
get the best and fastest answer
 
PerlMonks  

Re: PREFIX patch for Module::Build

by Steve_p (Priest)
on Jun 02, 2005 at 02:31 UTC ( [id://462727]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to PREFIX patch for Module::Build

One thing to consider is using Test::More instead of Test. The use of Test::More is suggested by the Phalanx project. Also, a slow conversion to using Test::More to test core modules has been in the works for a while as well. Since Module::Build is slated to be part of the core in 5.10, it'd be nice to avoid having to redo the tests later.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: PREFIX patch for Module::Build
by dragonchild (Archbishop) on Jun 02, 2005 at 02:37 UTC
    You're absolutely right, and I use Test::More in my modules. However, I used Test based on two considerations:
    1. The other testfiles in the Module::Build distribution used Test instead of Test::More and I felt that following their lead would be one less reason to deny the patch.
    2. Test is in the core for 5.003. Test::More doesn't enter the core until 5.005_03 (or so). I suspect that's the reason Ken Williams chose to use Test.
    • In general, if you think something isn't in Perl, try it out, because it usually is. :-)
    • "What is the sound of Perl? Is it not the sound of a wall that people have stopped banging their heads against?"
[reply]

In Section Meditations

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?

www.com | www.net | www.org
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://462727]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? • Last hour • Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others about the Monastery: (4)
As of 2024-04-19 05:49 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found