Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
P is for Practical
 
PerlMonks  

Re: ++ vote for people who help in Chatterbox

by jeffa (Bishop)
on May 20, 2005 at 17:50 UTC ( [id://459075]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to ++ vote for people who help in Chatterbox

Easy. Just go to their home node. Click on the link for their writeups -- that will take you to Perl Monks User Search (for example castaway's user search) and sort by Highest Rep first. Pick some of those and there is a good chance they will receive an XP boost when you ++. But do read the content first and make sure you agree.

jeffa

L-LL-L--L-LL-L--L-LL-L--
-R--R-RR-R--R-RR-R--R-RR
B--B--B--B--B--B--B--B--
H---H---H---H---H---H---
(the triplet paradiddle with high-hat)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: ++ vote for people who help in Chatterbox
by ihb (Deacon) on May 20, 2005 at 18:34 UTC

    Some people, like me, have only written replies and no root nodes. A reply should always be read in its context hence you likely have to read a whole lot more than just the writeup. Even for root nodes you should read the replies as they might provide enlightening insights on the subject, so I wouldn't say this is a good method to ++ someone. It's a whole lot of work if you just want to ++.

    It's a method, but I don't find it very satisfactory.

    Update: I'm not sure who you (jeffa) are arguing with in your reply, but I couldn't agree more. I think that in large the same applies to replies to posts too.

    ihb

    See perltoc if you don't know which perldoc to read!

      The "problem" is that there is no method for giving XP to a user without ++'ing a node. We could add stock buttons to everyone's home node, "++ this user!" ... but isn't that just opening a can of worms? The beauty about the moderation system here is you can vote once and only once for a given node. Sure, you could create another account (sock puppet), and even though we have means of determining such accounts and means to remove their voting priveledge ... it's still not 100% fool proof. I could register an account at an Internet cafe and only use it there.

      I'm afraid that there simply is no satifactory way to achieve what the original poster wants. But you know what? Most of the CB denizens aren't talking in the CB for XP points. They do it because they genuinely want to help -- without reward of XP. This, in essence, is a non-problem.

      jeffa

      L-LL-L--L-LL-L--L-LL-L--
      -R--R-RR-R--R-RR-R--R-RR
      B--B--B--B--B--B--B--B--
      H---H---H---H---H---H---
      (the triplet paradiddle with high-hat)
      
      I read it, came across it again, and this is not pointed towards you so much as everyone else.

      Parent to this post isn't against what jeffa said. It seems more like an amendment or further instruction. Post instruction, he replied with how he feels about it.

      All it sums up to is, if you are going to do it this method, do it right. I find doing it as such inconvenient and wish there was another way about doing it.

      Did I get that right?

      ----
      Give me strength for today.. I will not talk it away..
      Just for a moment.. It will burn through the clouds.. and shine down on me.

      Well, chances are you'll be well rewarded for your time reading the complete thread, and you may end up finding more than one place to ++ somone. :-)

      (Don't tell anyone, but I vote quite rarely these days. I do, occasionally, find a note someone posted whom I wasn't very familiar with before, and then I more or less randomly go over their old posts. I learn a lot, and sometimes ++ a lot too.)

Re^2: ++ vote for people who help in Chatterbox
by bart (Canon) on May 22, 2005 at 21:40 UTC
    Please don't do that. I don't want anybody voting on my nodes because they're by me. It should only be the quality of the nodes themselves that make you upvote, or if that's how you choose it to be, downvote them.
Re^2: ++ vote for people who help in Chatterbox
by belg4mit (Prior) on Jun 12, 2005 at 10:42 UTC
    I think a better way would be to super search limitied by the author (should already then be much less hard on the server) for keywords related to the subject and upvote a node that is actually related.

    --
    I'm not belgian but I play one on TV. On dit que je parle comme un belge aussi.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://459075]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others surveying the Monastery: (5)
As of 2024-04-24 06:16 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found