Re: Module::Build users -- please use the "traditional" create_makefile

A while back I started a crapstorm on the qa list about maintaining META.yml which led to a Module::Build vs. ExtUtils::MakeMaker debate and a rant by Schwern.

For me at least, M::B just has better support for maintaining the various information in META.yml moreso than in E::MM. My beef with using the 'traditional' option is that it puts optional modules into the Makefile PREREQ_PM making them build requirements (as apposed to just requirement for test running).

Which leads to the whole debate of if a passing 'make test' is a requirement of a 'successful build', then why aren't the tests just run at the end of 'make' or 'Build'.

But I digress...

Comment on Re: Module::Build users -- please use the "traditional" create_makefile_pl option

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Module::Build users -- please use the "traditional" create_makefile_pl option by perrin (Chancellor) on May 18, 2005 at 18:27 UTC
I don't run the tests when I'm installing known modules in an automated build. I definitely don't want them to be mandatory. It sounds like the traditional option should just be changed to leave out the optional modules. Incidentally, META.yml is also pretty annoying, because YAML is so fragile and seems to exist for the sole purpose of thumbing its nose at XML, but that's not a serious problem for me.	[reply]
Re^3: Module::Build users -- please use the "traditional" create_makefile_pl option by jk2addict (Chaplain) on May 18, 2005 at 18:31 UTC
I don't run the tests when I'm installing known modules in an automated build. I definitely don't want them to be mandatory. This is a loaded question; and doesn't mean I don't do the exact same thing. :-) If you skip the tests, how do you know the install will work as intended?	[reply]
Re^4: Module::Build users -- please use the "traditional" create_makefile_pl option by perrin (Chancellor) on May 18, 2005 at 18:39 UTC
I have tests for my application. If those pass, I don't care if the individual module tests pass. I'm installing modules that I know on an OS that I have used them on before, so I don't consider it risky. But there's another issue too -- some modules have tests that are not meant to be run when installing. These are tests that the developer wrote for development use and that will not work on other machines. So, the assumption that tests should be run on install is not shared by all module authors.	[reply]
Re^5: Module::Build users -- please use the "traditional" create_makefile_pl option by jk2addict (Chaplain) on May 18, 2005 at 18:54 UTC
Re^6: Module::Build users -- please use the "traditional" create_makefile_pl option by perrin (Chancellor) on May 18, 2005 at 20:37 UTC
Re^6: Module::Build users -- please use the "traditional" create_makefile_pl option by dragonchild (Archbishop) on May 18, 2005 at 19:06 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here
Re^6: Module::Build users -- please use the "traditional" create_makefile_pl option by cazz (Pilgrim) on May 18, 2005 at 19:23 UTC


Welcome to the Monastery
	PerlMonks

Re: Module::Build users -- please use the "traditional" create_makefile_pl option