The foreach keyword is actually a synonym for the for keyword, so you can use foreach for readability or for for brevity. (Or because the Bourne shell is more familiar to you than csh, so writing for comes more naturally.)

You're right. Thanks for downvoting me, I deserved it.

Not downvoting you, just the post. I have a lot of respect for many people on here, you (highly) included. People often say explanations should be given with downvotes. There's mine :)
--------------
"But what of all those sweet words you spoke in private?"
"Oh that's just what we call pillow talk, baby, that's all."

Can we both agree on this:

In Perl, the keywords "for" and "foreach" are identical. In many other languages, the two words stand for two different kinds of loops

perlsyn has a heading called "for loops", and a heading called "foreach loops". I'm going to quote that as an authority, as it was written by the only authority who really matters. Therefore, Perl has for loops, and foreach loops, and overlapping keywords. "for" and "foreach" are not the same in that sentence.

Ok, how about:

In Perl, the keywords "for" and "foreach" are identical. In many other languages the two keywords refer to two different loop structures. Perl supports both loop structures, but allows the use of either keyword for either structure.

Many other languages? Could you name a few that actually have the keywords 'for' and 'foreach', and refer to two different loop structures?