|
in reply to DBD::SQLite tuning
I'd like to know why you'd use SQLite for this application instead of BerkleyDB. If all you are storing is key value pairs then SQLite is overkill. Sounds like a perfect fit for BerkleyDB to me. Its not as cumbersome as MySQL and is just as easy to install and use as SQLite. Did you choose SQLite because of some other factor? |
Re^2: DBD::SQLite tuning
by perrin (Chancellor) on Mar 16, 2005 at 21:18 UTC
|
I wouldn't. I'm benchamrking it because someone on the mod_perl list claimed that SQLite 3 was faster than BDB and I wanted to see if it was true. | [reply] |
|
