Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Single Sign-On?

by crenz (Priest)
on Mar 09, 2005 at 09:44 UTC ( [id://437834]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Single Sign-On?

Frankly speaking, I feel the effort is not worth it. For this kind of sites, I am comfortable with storing the password in the browser (especially since I can manage the passwords neatly with Mac OS X' keychain). This is much easier for me than to ask people to implement a single-login system :-).

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Single Sign-On?
by dynamo (Chaplain) on Mar 10, 2005 at 19:12 UTC
    I use MacOS's keychain as well, and an encrypted text file as a backup. Keychain IS single-sign-on. It could technically work the same way with a 3rd party administrating, if you could trust them enough. For many people (myself included), this trust issue means that MS was the absolute least qualified company imaginable (with the possible exception of SCO) to launch something like that. Most people trust their own machines more than any companies, thus it works better that way.
[reply]
Re^2: Single Sign-On?
by crypix (Acolyte) on Mar 10, 2005 at 05:24 UTC
    That is basically how I feel. I do seem to loose alot of my username and passwords when I run one my disk cleaning utilities without disabling the browser password manager option. I have found this tool extremely useful...
    Access Manager
    ~crypix
[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?

www.com | www.net | www.org
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://437834]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? • Last hour • Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others admiring the Monastery: (4)
As of 2024-04-24 22:19 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found