Syntactic Confectionery Delight | |
PerlMonks |
Re^3: [off-site] Perl snippets at Microsoftby dragonchild (Archbishop) |
on Mar 04, 2005 at 13:31 UTC ( [id://436565]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
The absence of strict, warnings, and taint don't necessarily imply a bad script.
No, it doesn't. Each is useful for different purposes.
Of these three, I would add strict and taint. Warnings are ... annoying in production code. I take it out in my CPAN stuff. I would add taint because I'm not sure what Win32::OLE is going to return to me. I'd like to see if Perl trusts it before I do. Being right, does not endow the right to be rude; politeness costs nothing.
In Section
Meditations
|
|