Re: Perl oddities

pipe A=>B
[download]

does rather the opposite to what it looks like it should.

Comment on Re: Perl oddities Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Perl oddities by ikegami (Patriarch) on Mar 01, 2005 at 22:45 UTC
So does `push(@a => $b);`. Why are you using `=>` instead of `,`? By the way, your code is equivalent to `pipe('A', B);` and not `pipe(A, B)`.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^3: Perl oddities by Dedalus (Scribe) on Mar 02, 2005 at 20:04 UTC
Why should not I? It is perfectly valid, and would seem to make visual sense, pipe one thing into an other. Arrows are pretty, but not DWIM, it is a shame.	[reply]
Re^3: Perl oddities by hardburn (Abbot) on Mar 02, 2005 at 19:26 UTC
I've taken to using `=>`, having been inspired by Abigail-II's tendancy tward the fact comma. I put it in whenever the expressions on each side are somehow related. "There is no shame in being self-taught, only in not trying to learn in the first place." -- Atrus, Myst: The Book of D'ni.	[reply] [d/l]


We don't bite newbies here... much
	PerlMonks