|Just another Perl shrine|
Re^2: A room for CPAN Modules discussion?by monsieur_champs (Curate)
|on Feb 11, 2005 at 13:50 UTC ( #430091=note: print w/replies, xml )||Need Help??|
Fellow Tanktalus wrote:
As for using Perlmonks Discussion as a place for discussing modules - that seems wrong to me, too. This is about discussing perlmonks, not modules (that's what SoPW is for). Which, I suppose, makes this particular thread on-topic here, but what the thread is about would not be on-topic here, IMO.
Dear fellow, I beg your pardon. I don't make myself clear as water at the first post.
I'm using PerlMonks Discussion to suggest a new Category, which name could be Module Parliament, the place where issues like module architecture and adoption of orphaned modules could take place publically, inside PerlMonks (that is a well-advertised, well-known forum for Perl and Community-related discussions).
Hope that now my point is clear like the water from the Monastery fountain.
Peace and Glory
In Section Perl Monks Discussion