Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight

Re: De Duping Street Addresses Fuzzily

by eyepopslikeamosquito (Bishop)
on Feb 01, 2005 at 01:58 UTC ( #426785=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to De Duping Street Addresses Fuzzily

I wrote one of these in C years ago, before I knew Perl. We got the job because the mailing house didn't fancy paying hundreds of thousands of dollars for a commercial US address deduplicator that didn't work particularly well on Australian addresses. The job took months, was a fixed price contract, and I think we lost money on that one. I remember that squeezing out high performance when de-duplicating millions of addresses was a challenge.

The obvious general approach is to parse the addresses into a canonical internal form -- then use that to compare addresses. This sort of software is necessarily riddled with heuristics and ambiguities and can never be perfect -- for example, does "Mr John and Bill Camel" mean "Mr John" and "Mr Bill Camel" or "Mr John Camel" and "Mr Bill Camel"? For performance reasons you can't afford to compare every address with every other one, so you need to break them into "buckets" and compare all addresses in each bucket. How do you choose the buckets? Not sure, but I remember bucketing on post code worked out quite well for us.

This thread may be of interest: Fuzzy matching of postal addresses on comp.lang.python of 17-jan-2005

Update: Kim Ryan has years of commercial experience in this field, so I suggest you check out his CPAN modules.

Update: See also: Re^3: Split first and last names (References on Parsing Names and Addresses)

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://426785]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others pondering the Monastery: (2)
As of 2023-03-24 06:45 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Which type of climate do you prefer to live in?

    Results (60 votes). Check out past polls.