Re^2: Which perl do you use?

...and can justify the upgrade...

I think you've hit on a good point. This is precisely the reason why some of our production boxen are running 5.6.1 and not something later. Upgrading Perl on 'stable' systems that have been in production for a couple of years is just asking for a roaring chorus of if it aint broke, don't fix it.

-- vek --

Comment on Re^2: Which perl do you use?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Which perl do you use? by greenFox (Vicar) on Jan 27, 2005 at 05:54 UTC
To be honest I have gotten away with justifications as thin as "standardise Perl build across infrastructure..." but thats probably because large organisations, like the one I work for, tend to be teaming with people who love to hear about things being "standardised" grin -- Do not seek to follow in the footsteps of the wise. Seek what they sought. -Basho	[reply]


go ahead... be a heretic
	PerlMonks