Estimated time it would take me to find a new unannounced feature on PM

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Estimated time it would take me to find a new unannounced feature on PM by chromatic (Archbishop) on Nov 16, 2000 at 04:12 UTC
How long has there been a voting booth?!	[reply]
RE: Estimated time it would take me to find a new unannounced feature on PM by lemming (Priest) on Nov 16, 2000 at 01:00 UTC
Why do I get the feeling that there's a new feature on PM?	[reply]
RE: RE: Estimated time it would take me to find a new unannounced feature on PM by vroom (His Eminence) on Nov 16, 2000 at 01:05 UTC
I was especially sneaky this time... no one caught any server errors while I was doing my magic. vroom \| Tim Vroom \| vroom@cs.hope.edu	[reply]
Re: Estimated time it would take me to find a new unannounced feature on PM by eduardo (Curate) on Nov 16, 2000 at 10:44 UTC
i'm afraid that this poll is misleading. i feel disenfranchised, i demand a recount.	[reply]
Re: Re: Estimated time it would take me to find a new unannounced feature on PM by royalanjr (Chaplain) on Nov 16, 2000 at 20:17 UTC
Yea! This butterfly ballot thing is way wrong! I'll see you all in court!!!! Roy Alan make it stop....lol	[reply]
Re: Estimated time it would take me to find a new unannounced feature on PM by turnstep (Parson) on Nov 16, 2000 at 03:24 UTC
What are all these monkeys doing in the Monastery?!? :)	[reply]
Re: Re: Estimated time it would take me to find a new unannounced feature on PM by mischief (Hermit) on Nov 16, 2000 at 20:58 UTC
I thought that's what Monk was short for?	[reply]
(redmist) Re: Estimated time it would take me to find a new unannounced feature on PM by redmist (Deacon) on Nov 16, 2000 at 10:56 UTC
I said that "My Powers Of Observation Are Weak", but I was under the understanding that by "weak", vroom meant "excellent/bionic/robotic". IDENTIFICATION DIVISION. PROGRAM-ID. redmist. AUTHOR. God (Larry Wall/Alan Cox hybrid). CONTACT. redmist@users.sourceforge.net	[reply]
RE: Estimated time it would take me to find a new unannounced feature on PM by Albannach (Monsignor) on Nov 16, 2000 at 01:32 UTC
I guess since vroom is in charge, he can enter the Monastery as an obfuscation if he likes... but I don't know that he'll get much ++ for it. But of course he's seen to that too - genius!	[reply]
RE: Estimated time it would take me to find a new unannounced feature on PM by Blue (Hermit) on Nov 16, 2000 at 02:34 UTC
I made the assumption when I voted that someone knew of the feature, so I'd see something I hadn't seen before and start digging. And, becuase that felt like an estimate to my brain, I padded it. 8) Guess I now gotta put my money where my mouth was and wander around with an eye out for something new. Gonna go stroll the monestary. Might start searching on requests to get an idea what was added... =Blue ...you might be eaten by a grue...	[reply]
Re: RE: Estimated time it would take me to find a new unannounced feature on PM by Blue (Hermit) on Nov 16, 2000 at 02:43 UTC
Ok, I've found something new. I don't knwo if it's it, but it is new. And I've done the obvious something to indicate I've found it. If you know what it is, that should be enough to verify, if not it shouldn't give any clues. And if I just found something that's new 'to me' but not to PM, then boy do I have egg on my face. Update: Well, I've got egg on my face. I found the Everything Developers nodelet option on my user settings page. However, that was added yesterday, so it's old news already. It came out in the chatterbox what the new thing was. I was wrong. ...the monk learns that not is as it seems... =Blue	[reply]
Re: Estimated time it would take me to find a new unannounced feature on PM by PsychoSpunk (Hermit) on Nov 18, 2000 at 02:35 UTC
I think I just found the newest unannounced feature. A quick check with vroom ought to let me know if I did better than a blindfolded monkey. ALL HAIL BRAK!!!	[reply]
Re: Re: Estimated time it would take me to find a new unannounced feature on PM by jepri (Parson) on Nov 18, 2000 at 14:26 UTC
I have discovered proof of the Reimann conjecture, will mail it to you after my trip.... ____________________ Jeremy	[reply]
RE: Estimated time it would take me to find a new unannounced feature on PM by AgentM (Curate) on Nov 16, 2000 at 01:07 UTC
Well, it ain't MonkMail. :o( AgentM Systems nor Nasca Enterprises nor Bone::Easy nor Macperl is responsible for the comments made by AgentM. Remember, you can build any logical system with NOR.	[reply]
Re: Estimated time it would take me to find a new unannounced feature on PM by Adam (Vicar) on Dec 01, 2000 at 06:12 UTC
It only took two weeks: Is the new feature in question here the new and improved Super Search? Or am I still a blind monkey?	[reply]
(so, what was it?) Re: Estimated time it would take me to find a new unannounced feature on PM by ZZamboni (Curate) on Nov 27, 2000 at 04:57 UTC
OK, so for those of us who are not better than a blindfolded monkey (in addition to, in my case, having ungodly amounts of work that have prevented me from hanging around here too much lately)... what was the unannounced new feature? :-) --ZZamboni	[reply]
Re: (so, what was it?) Re: Estimated time it would take me to find a new unannounced feature on PM by tye (Sage) on Nov 28, 2000 at 00:50 UTC
As I recall, it was a "Preview" button for replies (vroom had recently added a "Preview" button a few other places) and the "New" button being renamed to "Submit". - tye (but my friends call me "Tye")	[reply]
(jeffa) RE: Estimated time it would take me to find a new unannounced feature on PM by jeffa (Bishop) on Nov 16, 2000 at 01:06 UTC
You mean features like "here is a new whistle to tinker with" or them features like "It's not a bug feature" . . . I honestly miss seeing stuff like: Server error . . . please contact adminstrator with following undeciferable code: DF:34:A1:blah blah from time to time, oh well . . .	[reply]


Perl-Sensitive Sunglasses
	PerlMonks

Estimated time it would take me to find a new unannounced feature on PM

AgentM Systems nor Nasca Enterprises nor Bone::Easy nor Macperl is responsible for the comments made by AgentM. Remember, you can build any logical system with NOR.