Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Don't ask to ask, just ask
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: XML::Fling begone?

by Aristotle (Chancellor)
on Dec 19, 2004 at 17:50 UTC ( [id://416022]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: XML::Fling begone?
in thread XML::Fling begone?

Note that I'm proposing this not solely for the speed gains, but also for the added safety afforded by Genx. It offers more of what Fling does well and less of its drawbacks.

Makeshifts last the longest.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: XML::Fling begone?
by demerphq (Chancellor) on Dec 19, 2004 at 17:54 UTC

    Its just that XML::FLing is fairly pervasive is all. Also its interface quirks are definately exploited in the code base. Converting wont be straight-forward unfortunately.

    ---
    demerphq

[reply]

      I know — that's why I tossed this thought out first before I sunk any time into the idea at all. What I'm asking is, do you think it is at all worthwhile to look into this (let alone do it)?

      Makeshifts last the longest.

[reply]

        As I said before, it would have to be a lot faster, and solve some problem that we have with XML:Fling to be worthwhile. If the benchmarks showed a signifigant time difference then id say at minimum further research would be warranted.

        ---
        demerphq

[reply]

In Section Inner Scriptorium

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?

www.com | www.net | www.org
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://416022]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? • Last hour • Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others making s'mores by the fire in the courtyard of the Monastery: (4)
As of 2024-04-25 16:33 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found