Re^3: strong typing

in reply to Re^2: strong typing
in thread (Completely OT) - Hero(i)n programming language on Slashdot

I said they're both scalars. Perl's type system has no concept of "integer", "boolean", etc.--it only knows about scalars, arrays, etc. Since the orginal code presented only deals with scalars, there is only one type involved: scalars.

"There is no shame in being self-taught, only in not trying to learn in the first place." -- Atrus, Myst: The Book of D'ni.

Comment on Re^3: strong typing

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: strong typing by jdporter (Paladin) on Dec 15, 2004 at 15:17 UTC
Perl's type system has no concept of "integer", "boolean", etc.--it only knows about scalars... But that isn't entirely true: `print 5 == "foo"; Argument "foo" isn't numeric in numeric eq (==)` [download] The fact that these types are checked/enforced at run time rather than compile time doesn't mean they aren't types. It's called dynamic typing.	[reply] [d/l]
Re^5: strong typing by chromatic (Archbishop) on Dec 16, 2004 at 00:14 UTC
Those aren't types in Perl. Those are values.	[reply]
Re^6: strong typing by jdporter (Paladin) on Dec 16, 2004 at 03:21 UTC
Huh? You're saying `numeric` is a value? No. It's a type. Values have types. It's the type of "foo" that perl is complaining about, not its value.	[reply] [d/l]
Re^7: strong typing by chromatic (Archbishop) on Dec 16, 2004 at 04:23 UTC
Re^8: strong typing by jdporter (Paladin) on Dec 16, 2004 at 15:01 UTC
Re^4: strong typing by gmpassos (Priest) on Dec 15, 2004 at 22:52 UTC
In the high level you are right, Perl makes a good abstraction, where we don't need to think about numeric types and booleans. But internally it have to do this convertions to integer to make the arithmetic operation, and than it converts again to string. SCALAR is the group of all this types! Graciliano M. P. "Creativity is the expression of liberty".	[reply]

In Section Perl News