Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
P is for Practical
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: Hash versus substitutation efficiency?

by tilly (Archbishop)
on Oct 11, 2004 at 22:28 UTC ( [id://398319]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: Hash versus substitutation efficiency?
in thread Hash versus substitutation efficiency?

You're right that I don't actually know. But in past instances where I've given this tip, I've had several people tell me privately that they hadn't used strict, and none tell me that I was wrong, they actually were using strict. Therefore I think it very likely that he isn't using strict.
  • Comment on Re^3: Hash versus substitutation efficiency?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Hash versus substitutation efficiency?
by pg (Canon) on Oct 11, 2004 at 23:04 UTC

    That's perfectly okay. You did it for a good will, and you are always helpful. I just thought that, in this case, your conclusion was not supported by strong evidence and was logically defected, and it is better to make the right message to everyone.

    In general, use strict is always a very helpful tip.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://398319]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others avoiding work at the Monastery: (None)
    As of 2024-04-25 04:25 GMT
    Sections?
    Information?
    Find Nodes?
    Leftovers?
      Voting Booth?

      No recent polls found