http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=395560


in reply to Re^8: Wassercrats: Why are you still here?
in thread Abigail-II and some thoughts

This node falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
  • Comment on Re^9: Wassercrats: Why are you still here?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^10: Wassercrats: Why are you still here?
by Anonymous Monk on Oct 01, 2004 at 18:40 UTC
    Re: LinuxQuestions
    So you're blaming your bad behavior on everyone else? Sorry I don't buy that; no one forced you to start throwing insults.

    They aren't getting as much flack as you because they are far better behaved than you. Their insults are few and far between, whereas your insults are pervasive and continuous. Not only that, but you also insult the entire community when one member of the community insults you.


    Re: Petruchio
    You didn't get reaped for defending yourself, you got reaped because you started insulting people. If you consider what he said as an insult, you've got some serious comprehension issues you should be dealing with.


    Re Downvoting:
    Again, you have some serious comprehension issues if you're equating down voting to insulting. Down voting someone does not equate to calling them an asshole. If you're considering that justification for your actions, its just going to get worse from here on in; the more you insult people, the more down votes you're going to get.


    Re Tim Vroom:
    He doesn't say anything because it is a community run site. He isn't your nanny, and its not his responsibility to hold your hand.


    Now, lets take a closer look at your logic here. From your Petruchio response, you feel justified in insulting people when the say things to you. From your Tim Vroom response, you feel justified in insulting people when the don't say things to you. QED you feel justified insulting people all the time. Does that give you any insight on why people are down voting you?
    A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
Re^10: Wassercrats: Why are you still here?
by logan (Curate) on Oct 02, 2004 at 00:08 UTC
    Tim Vroom is responcible for all of this. He allows the idiotic votes and insulting posts and says nothing.

    If Vroom is responsible for maintaining order and enforcing civility in the Monastary, and being as Perlmonks is his site, that means that he has complete freedom to do with it as he sees fit.

    If Vroom asks you to leave, will you?

    -Logan
    "What do I want? I'm an American. I want more."

      You're damn right I'm leaving. I don't need to be asked.
Re^10: Wassercrats: Why are you still here?
by Anonymous Monk on Oct 01, 2004 at 10:53 UTC
    Almost nobody has complained about people insulting me or about the upvotes they get, and this has gone on long before the FU or any other name calling by me. Also, almost nobody complained about perfectly good posts of mine being downvoted.
    Why should they?
    • You're a hypocritical jerk
    • Your tantrum has outlasted any carried on by previous trolls
    • You keep perpetuating your flamefest ad-nauseum
    • After cursing the monastery and shitting on our doorsteps, you start dictating how people should behave?
    In case you haven't gotten the message, people are sick and tired of hearing spew flame. Regardless of what you say from this point forward, every one of your nodes will undoubtedly be downlvoted because no one wants to hear anything you have to say. If the monastery was a physical place you would have been kicked out a long time ago.