Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: Does the monastery want a threaded newest nodes?

by Happy-the-monk (Canon)
on Sep 22, 2004 at 22:54 UTC ( [id://393076]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: Does the monastery want a threaded newest nodes?
in thread Does the monastery want a threaded newest nodes?

Timing like hattmoward did, I get 13 seconds for both, so I see no time-to-load issue for me.

I am very impressed by the looks of it (++demerphq's work).
I am also very happy with the new usability too. Yay!

What I like to preserve though is that PM isn't working too much the same way Usenet News does - at least in my perception. All questions on top, waiting for people to find answers to them.
Presented in this way ,PM's newest nodes look more like Usenet, threaded and such... well, we will see it evolve.

Cheerio, Sören

  • Comment on Re^3: Does the monastery want a threaded newest nodes?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://393076]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others wandering the Monastery: (6)
As of 2024-04-24 08:08 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found