Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Does the monastery want a threaded newest nodes?

by FoxtrotUniform (Prior)
on Sep 22, 2004 at 18:53 UTC ( [id://393021]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Does the monastery want a threaded newest nodes?

Beautiful. I really like the threaded interface - it seems a lot less random and cluttered than the "newest first" interface we have.

As I type, Sidhekin is Chatterboxing about "(using) CSS to get rid of some of that clutter". I don't find the interface cluttered, but I like the idea of embedding the "right" kind of CSS (whatever that means) to let users customize their view of it. This is something I know very little about, but it sure sounds cool. What kind of CSS is there that would allow user-level hacking, and what else could be easily added?

Thanks again! This is great stuff.

--
F o x t r o t U n i f o r m
Found a typo in this node? /msg me
% man 3 strfry

  • Comment on Re: Does the monastery want a threaded newest nodes?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://393021]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others examining the Monastery: (3)
As of 2024-04-18 18:56 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found