Re^30: Perl 6 ... dead? (no, just convalescing)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^31: Perl 6 ... dead? (no, just convalescing) by TimToady (Parson) on Sep 03, 2004 at 23:44 UTC
You guys going for the record on depth or something?	[reply]
Re^32: Perl 6 ... dead? (no, just convalescing) by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Sep 03, 2004 at 23:58 UTC
Hey, the deepest so far is yours! Err, was yours. Wait, was that a challenge or something? `:-)` Makeshifts last the longest.	[reply]
Re^33: Perl 6 ... dead? (no, just convalescing) by grinder (Bishop) on Oct 01, 2004 at 14:47 UTC
Well this is certainly the deepest thread I've come across in quite some time. I know this for a fact, because for the first time in a long time I got the "some notes below your chosen depth are not shown here". I had to bump my settings up to 50, which should tide me over, at least for a while `:o)` - another intruder with the mooring of the heat of the Perl	[reply]
Re^32: Perl 6 ... dead? (no, just convalescing) by jryan (Vicar) on Sep 04, 2004 at 01:40 UTC
Well, um, well, uh... sure? :)	[reply]


No such thing as a small change
	PerlMonks